Practical eCommerce

ACH Direct

Manage Subscriptions · Subscribe Now · F.A.Q.'s

HOME · Friday, May 16, 2008

Accounting, Management & Legal

A Tangled Web We Weave

Internet libel cases more common than you thought

By: Ryan Welton
Comments: 0

The choice between having nothing nice to say and saying nothing at all, at least on the web, is becoming increasingly easier by the day. Say nothing at all.

When the 1996 Communications Decency Act (CDA) was struck down to allow indecent, as opposed to obscene speech, the effect – unintended or otherwise – was to give online service providers immunity from the actions of its customers. While the act was created with obscenity in mind, the CDA was part of the larger Telecommunications Act of 1996, and that piece of law says that your service provider is not liable should you knowingly or unknowingly commit libel on your Web site.

However, if you knowingly or unknowingly commit libel on your website, you could be in deep trouble. On the other hand, if you suspect somebody has committed libel against you online, you have the same recourse as if the person had defamed you in the morning paper. In other words, just because the Web seems like a no-rules environment, don’t think for a second that you’re not protected.

Any fourth-year journalism student can tell you that libel is comprised of the following elements:


  1. Defamation – includes accusations of criminal behavior, moral turpitude or professional incompetence. It can be direct or inferred defamation.

  2. Publication – includes a printed newspaper article, a Web page or a campus flyer. Technically, it can include graffiti, something written in a bathroom stall or doodling on a napkin.

  3. Damage – includes damage both actual and perceived, and is not necessary to show libel although it helps to assess award. The reason showing damage is not necessary in libel cases is that by printing something shown to be defamatory, the damage is assumed.

  4. Identification – includes both individual and group identification, when the group is under 15 people. When the group is between 15-100 people, defamation should be shown to point to each person in the group. If the group is more than 100 people strong, there is no identification. For example, claiming that all piano players are clinically insane will not result in a successful libel suit; however, claiming that all the musicians at your local church are insane just might.

  5. Fault – includes a couple of degrees of fault, the first of which is assumed if there is libel. However, a higher degree of fault can be found should the writer have published defamatory information knowingly or with reckless disregard. And, according to a famous 1964 court case, journalists can be found guilty of libel if their actions are found to be malicious.

  6. Truth – includes an interpretation of whether the alleged defamation is actually true. If the alleged defamation turns out to be true, then there is no libel.


Truth is that there is a lot of gray area as it pertains to what constitutes libel on the Web. Online business proprietors not only concern themselves with what’s printed about their ecommerce stores and their products, but also themselves. The potential that somebody sometime will publish something online that casts you, your company or your product in something less than the best light is high. Your best bet is to play nicely, work with the individual and the ISP to resolve any differences or concerns amicably and with diplomacy.

On the other hand, while the odds of winning a libel case are notoriously slim; if you have been libeled, take heed – many have come before.

Here are a few plain-English explanations of some famous online libel cases:

Cubby v. CompuServe, 1991

Plaintiff says that CompuServe should be held liable for alleged defamatory bulletin board postings in a forum called Rumorville, available on CompuServe’s system. The plaintiff’s argument was that, as the publisher of the alleged defamatory information, CompuServe should be held accountable. The Court disagreed primarily because CompuServe did not have any procedures in place for monitoring posts regularly.

Stratton-Oakmont & Porush v. Prodigy, 1995

Prodigy gets sued by investment banking firm Stratton- Oakmont and its president, Daniel Porush, claiming that anonymous postings on Prodigy’s Money Talk bulletin board were libelous. According to a summary found on the Eff.org website, “The statements claimed that Stratton Oakmont committed criminal and fraudulent acts in connection with the initial public offering of stock of Solomon-Page, Ltd.”

Because Prodigy had a policy of regularly monitoring message board posts, the court decided that the company had editorial control of its forum, which was moderated by a volunteer. The court, therefore, held that Prodigy was liable for the content of the forum’s messages.

Stephen J. Barrett, et al. v. Ilena Rosenthal, 2003

Illena Rosenthal posts a controversial opinion piece, written by somebody else, to a Usenet news group. The article was critical of a Canadian-based doctor, Terry Polevoy.

Advertisement

Polevoy sued. The case was dismissed. But then, a California Court of Appeals overruled the dismissal, ruling that people could sue Internet publishers for what others write on their sites, a departure (or re-interpretation, depending on your point of view) from the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. The California Supreme Court is reviewing, but the case’s implications have bloggers, in particular, extremely nervous.

Because blogging typically involves some original writing interspersed with others’ work and ideas, complete with links, bloggers are concerned that anything less than a victory for Rosenthal would leave them open for liability.

Blinklist | Del.icio.us | Furl | Ma.gnolia | Newsvine | Spurl | Reddit | Technorati

Published on Monday, August 01, 2005

Comments:

There are no comments posted for this article.

↑ Back to Top

Leave a comment:

Please enter the following security code exactly as it appears.


Comments are stripped of HTML code upon submission. All comments are submitted for approval prior to being published. Please allow up to 24 hours for the approval process to take place. Practical eCommerce reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason.

 


Related Articles

Articles at Practical eCommerce related to A Tangled Web We Weave:

Related Podcasts

Podcasts at Practical eCommerce related to A Tangled Web We Weave:

RSS 2.0 Feeds

Atom 1.0 Feeds

Technorati Tags

Ecommerce Articles

Browse All Articles
Browse our complete archive of ecommerce articles.
Accounting, Management & Legal
Ecommerce articles related to managing a small business including ecommerce accounting, business strategy and legal considerations.
Conversion & Usability
Online business articles about converting web site visitors into customers and how to gauge and improve your business website's usability.
Development & Programming
Articles to help designers, developers and programmers create successful, search engine friendly ecommerce websites and improve existing ones.
Hosting, Infrastructure & Software
Articles for ecommerce businesses about ecommerce web hosting, business infrastructure, business strategy and helpful ecommerce & small business software.
Interviews & Profiles
Interviews with prominent ecommerce business personalities and profiles of successful online businesses.
Inventory & Shipping
Ecommerce articles about inventory management, ecommerce order fulfillment and product shipping considerations.
Marketing & Revenue Growth
Articles relating to online marketing, email marketing and using the Internet to growing your business.
Search Engine Optimization
Search engine optimization articles for ecommerce business owners, strategists, marketers and developers.
Shopping Carts & Online Payments
Articles covering ecommerce shopping cart platforms and options for choosing an online payment gateway.
Training & Education
Tutorials and articles providing training and education for ecommerce business owners and developers of ecommerce websites.

Search Articles

Ecommerce Community

Ecommerce Blogs
Read our blogs about ecommerce topics written by industry professionals.
Community Forum
Connect with other ecommerce professionals to trade advice and answers in our community forum.
Podcasts
Check out our ecommerce podcasts covering topics ranging from interviews to tutorials.
RSS Content Feeds
Subscribe to our RSS feeds and have fresh ecommerce content delivered to you.

Ecommerce Resources

Free Email Newsletter
Sign up for Ecommerce Notes, our free email newsletter for ecommerce business owners and developers.
Ecommerce Directory
Browse our directory of ecommerce products and services, or submit your own listing in our directory.
Ecommerce Glossary
Familiarize yourself with terminology or submit terms to help others with our Ecommerce Glossary.
Events Calendar
Find out about upcoming ecommerce events or invite other ecommerce professionals by posting your own event.
Press Releases
Browse ecommerce related press releases and post your own press release for distribution.
Ecommerce Store & Back Issues
Pick up back issues of Practical eCommerce magazine along with other merchandise from Practical Ecommerce

About Practical eCommerce

Frequently Asked Questions
Look at frequently asked questions regarded using our website, subscribing to our magazine and more.
Advertising Information
Information about advertising in Practical eCommerce magazine, on our website, or in our email newsletters.
Editorial Sharing
Learn about options for sharing our content with your visitors, customers or employees.
About Us
Learn more about Practical Ecommerce magazine and meet our staff.
Contact Us
Contact Practical Ecommerce at any time for more information. We'd love to hear from you.
AdvertisementBDXIStone Edge TechnologiesArial Software

Copyright 2007 Confluence Distribution, Inc. and Practical eCommerce.
All Rights Reserved.

Privacy PolicyConditions of UseContact Us