<?xml version="1.0"  encoding="utf-8"?>
	<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
		<title>Comments to How Is An Atom Feed Different From An RSS Feed?</title>
		<link href="http://www.practicalecommerce.com/atom/article/409/" rel="self"/>
  	<updated>2008-05-23T06:53:11-07:00</updated>
		<author>
  	  <name>Practical Ecommerce</name>
			<email>info@practicalecommerce.com</email>
  	</author>
  	<id>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/</id>
		<rights>Copyright 2007 Confluence Publishing DBA Practical Ecommerce</rights>
		<entry>
			<title>Jack</title>
			<link href="http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/409/How-Is-An-Atom-Feed-Different-From-An-RSS-Feed/#comment11557" rel="alternate"/>
			<id>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/409/How-Is-An-Atom-Feed-Different-From-An-RSS-Feed/#comment11557</id>
			<updated>2008-05-23T06:53:11-07:00</updated>
			<summary>I validate an RSS, get message that adding an atom feed  would be a good idea. So I do. I validate again and get message Self reference document doesn&#039;t match an equivalant document. Duh. No real explantation of what this means. the atom link to the file is correct. Are they telling me I also need an atom feed xml file?  I have 140 feeds. So now i gotta create another 140 feeds using atom. Why can&#039;t I just combine both in one. </summary>
			</entry>
			
				<entry>
			<title>Jerry</title>
			<link href="http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/409/How-Is-An-Atom-Feed-Different-From-An-RSS-Feed/#comment4033" rel="alternate"/>
			<id>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/409/How-Is-An-Atom-Feed-Different-From-An-RSS-Feed/#comment4033</id>
			<updated>2007-11-06T08:44:07-07:00</updated>
			<summary>Very interesting -but which of the two is considered best or standard?</summary>
			</entry>
			
				<entry>
			<title>Gan Uesli Starling</title>
			<link href="http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/409/How-Is-An-Atom-Feed-Different-From-An-RSS-Feed/#comment373" rel="alternate"/>
			<id>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/409/How-Is-An-Atom-Feed-Different-From-An-RSS-Feed/#comment373</id>
			<updated>2007-02-18T22:27:19-07:00</updated>
			<summary>A fairly complete how-to for creating atom feeds is now on-line at this URL. I have included notes on one annoying browser quirk and also a Perl/CGI script to allow for sorting Atom feeds inside of an ordinary web browser.:

http://starling.us/atom</summary>
			</entry>
			
				<entry>
			<title>Randy Charles Morin</title>
			<link href="http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/409/How-Is-An-Atom-Feed-Different-From-An-RSS-Feed/#comment260" rel="alternate"/>
			<id>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/409/How-Is-An-Atom-Feed-Different-From-An-RSS-Feed/#comment260</id>
			<updated>2007-02-07T14:32:13-07:00</updated>
			<summary>According to the Rmail [http://www.r-mail.org/] database, Atom 1.0 still represents a fraction of 1% of all feeds.</summary>
			</entry>
			
				
	</feed>