<?xml version="1.0"  encoding="utf-8"?>
	<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
		<title>Comments to Yahoo! Panama: So Far, So Good</title>
		<link href="http://www.practicalecommerce.com/atom/article/459/" rel="self"/>
  	<updated>2007-08-10T16:29:37-07:00</updated>
		<author>
  	  <name>Practical Ecommerce</name>
			<email>info@practicalecommerce.com</email>
  	</author>
  	<id>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/</id>
		<rights>Copyright 2007 Confluence Publishing DBA Practical Ecommerce</rights>
		<entry>
			<title>Chris</title>
			<link href="http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/459/Yahoo-Panama-So-Far-So-Good/#comment3445" rel="alternate"/>
			<id>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/459/Yahoo-Panama-So-Far-So-Good/#comment3445</id>
			<updated>2007-08-10T16:29:37-07:00</updated>
			<summary>That&#039;s great, but Yahoo is a nightmare when it comes to reporting abuse.
There are a few companies using dynamic keyword insertion where the name of my company winds up being the title of the ad. It&#039;s a blatant attempt at misleading my potential clients.
So where is Yahoo now?
I just spent 3 hours trying to find out where I can report this abuse.
Aaaaaand once again Yahoo shows their true colors. I wish the public would just delete all links to Yahoo Search and Yahoo Directory.</summary>
			</entry>
			
				<entry>
			<title>Joel</title>
			<link href="http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/459/Yahoo-Panama-So-Far-So-Good/#comment1211" rel="alternate"/>
			<id>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/459/Yahoo-Panama-So-Far-So-Good/#comment1211</id>
			<updated>2007-04-12T12:11:20-07:00</updated>
			<summary>Kudos to Yahoo for coming out with such a strong advertising upgrade.  The key for us, as advertisers, is whether Yahoo can make inroads in capturing more search traffic from Google.  </summary>
			</entry>
			
				
	</feed>