<?xml version="1.0"  encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Comments to Email: Confidentiality Required</title>
			<link>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/261/Email-Confidentiality-Required/</link>
			<description>User submitted comments to Practical Ecommerce's article entitled Email: Confidentiality Required</description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright 2007 Confluence Publishing</copyright>
			<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:02:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
			<docs>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/rss/</docs>
			<generator>Practical Ecommerce v2.0.1</generator>
			<category>Ecommerce</category>
			<managingEditor>kmurdock@practicalecommerce.com</managingEditor>
			<webMaster>bgetting@practicalecommerce.com</webMaster>
			<ttl>60</ttl>
			<item>
			<title>Meri Lou</title>
			<link>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/261/Email-Confidentiality-Required/#comment3473</link>
			<description>Oh for heaven&#039;s sakes - ANY good Administrative Professional (AP) knows how to and USES the bcc: field for blast emails.
For the last 5 years, when our life &amp; health insurance office receives one from a carrier, I reply with the request to use the bcc: field. If they don&#039;t, (they usually do after an immediate apology from the AP reading the reply), we &quot;Block Sender&quot; them and don&#039;t use them in our client quotes. And if their reps. come around to visit, I tell them why.
Simple &amp; effective.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:02:04 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/261/Email-Confidentiality-Required/#comment3473</guid>
			</item>
			
				<item>
			<title>Ron</title>
			<link>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/261/Email-Confidentiality-Required/#comment2226</link>
			<description>I think anyone who sends ANY mail to multiple recipients either in the Cc or To field, should be fined $3500.00 for each additional recipient after the first mail was sent to, then make restitution to each of those recipients in the amount of $1000.00 !! ...have their computer use rights revoked for 90 days, then be forced to use a dial up connection at 28.8 kbps for a period of not more than 1 year. Even if all those are on the same team, it&#039;s still a privacy issue, it&#039;s like giving out a non-published phone number - damn it !@

Send the email TO &gt;you</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 09:12:13 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/261/Email-Confidentiality-Required/#comment2226</guid>
			</item>
			
				
		</channel>
	</rss>