<?xml version="1.0"  encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Comments to How Is An Atom Feed Different From An RSS Feed?</title>
			<link>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/409/How-Is-An-Atom-Feed-Different-From-An-RSS-Feed/</link>
			<description>User submitted comments to Practical Ecommerce's article entitled How Is An Atom Feed Different From An RSS Feed?</description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright 2007 Confluence Publishing</copyright>
			<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 06:53:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
			<docs>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/rss/</docs>
			<generator>Practical Ecommerce v2.0.1</generator>
			<category>Ecommerce</category>
			<managingEditor>kmurdock@practicalecommerce.com</managingEditor>
			<webMaster>bgetting@practicalecommerce.com</webMaster>
			<ttl>60</ttl>
			<item>
			<title>Jack</title>
			<link>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/409/How-Is-An-Atom-Feed-Different-From-An-RSS-Feed/#comment11557</link>
			<description>I validate an RSS, get message that adding an atom feed  would be a good idea. So I do. I validate again and get message Self reference document doesn&#039;t match an equivalant document. Duh. No real explantation of what this means. the atom link to the file is correct. Are they telling me I also need an atom feed xml file?  I have 140 feeds. So now i gotta create another 140 feeds using atom. Why can&#039;t I just combine both in one. </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 06:53:11 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/409/How-Is-An-Atom-Feed-Different-From-An-RSS-Feed/#comment11557</guid>
			</item>
			
				<item>
			<title>Jerry</title>
			<link>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/409/How-Is-An-Atom-Feed-Different-From-An-RSS-Feed/#comment4033</link>
			<description>Very interesting -but which of the two is considered best or standard?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 08:44:07 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/409/How-Is-An-Atom-Feed-Different-From-An-RSS-Feed/#comment4033</guid>
			</item>
			
				<item>
			<title>Gan Uesli Starling</title>
			<link>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/409/How-Is-An-Atom-Feed-Different-From-An-RSS-Feed/#comment373</link>
			<description>A fairly complete how-to for creating atom feeds is now on-line at this URL. I have included notes on one annoying browser quirk and also a Perl/CGI script to allow for sorting Atom feeds inside of an ordinary web browser.:

http://starling.us/atom</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 22:27:19 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/409/How-Is-An-Atom-Feed-Different-From-An-RSS-Feed/#comment373</guid>
			</item>
			
				<item>
			<title>Randy Charles Morin</title>
			<link>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/409/How-Is-An-Atom-Feed-Different-From-An-RSS-Feed/#comment260</link>
			<description>According to the Rmail [http://www.r-mail.org/] database, Atom 1.0 still represents a fraction of 1% of all feeds.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 14:32:13 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/409/How-Is-An-Atom-Feed-Different-From-An-RSS-Feed/#comment260</guid>
			</item>
			
				
		</channel>
	</rss>