<?xml version="1.0"  encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Comments to Field Test: Social Networking, Part 2 of 3</title>
			<link>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/680/Field-Test-Social-Networking-Part-2-of-3/</link>
			<description>User submitted comments to Practical Ecommerce's article entitled Field Test: Social Networking, Part 2 of 3</description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright 2007 Confluence Publishing</copyright>
			<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:59:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
			<docs>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/rss/</docs>
			<generator>Practical Ecommerce v2.0.1</generator>
			<category>Ecommerce</category>
			<managingEditor>kmurdock@practicalecommerce.com</managingEditor>
			<webMaster>bgetting@practicalecommerce.com</webMaster>
			<ttl>60</ttl>
			<item>
			<title>Sue Kirchner</title>
			<link>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/680/Field-Test-Social-Networking-Part-2-of-3/#comment6892</link>
			<description>I agree with Lisa. This article is very hard to read with the way it is divided up into question responses without knowing more about the type of merchant who is commenting.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:59:25 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/680/Field-Test-Social-Networking-Part-2-of-3/#comment6892</guid>
			</item>
			
				<item>
			<title>Lisa</title>
			<link>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/680/Field-Test-Social-Networking-Part-2-of-3/#comment6879</link>
			<description>Just a thought, but this type of article would be more helpful if you kept the merchants anonymous, and used a brief descriptor instead of &quot;field tester 4.&quot;  For example, a pet products etailer, or a parts emerchant etc.  Some social networking sites may work better than others for particular types of ecommerce businesses.  </description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:50:21 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/680/Field-Test-Social-Networking-Part-2-of-3/#comment6879</guid>
			</item>
			
				<item>
			<title>The Saint</title>
			<link>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/680/Field-Test-Social-Networking-Part-2-of-3/#comment6810</link>
			<description>SecuritySaint.com has had some success with social networking. Not enough to focus future endeavors, time is a huge factor.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:55:46 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/680/Field-Test-Social-Networking-Part-2-of-3/#comment6810</guid>
			</item>
			
				<item>
			<title>Brandon</title>
			<link>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/680/Field-Test-Social-Networking-Part-2-of-3/#comment6834</link>
			<description>I currently use Myspace.com as a link builder and it is a great site to get involved with my customers I market to.  The possiblities of new hits and the fact that it is a top site where the most people online is there both are the reasons I use it.  Not only this social network but there are many other online networks you can find located all around the world that have as many users that are great ways to boost hits. </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:54:38 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/680/Field-Test-Social-Networking-Part-2-of-3/#comment6834</guid>
			</item>
			
				
		</channel>
	</rss>