Practical eCommerce

 

Web Graphics: Why Are We So Limited?

JPG and GIF best for web design

Author: Ryan Welton
Publish Date: September 01, 2005
Category: Design & Development
Tags: photoshop, jpeg, gif, png

As a Web designer and developer, I have worked with graphics in a variety of formats. Anybody who uses Adobe Photoshop – the standard for design production in the interactive business – has learned his or her way around JPG, GIF, TIF, EPS, PSD, PCX and BMP files.

Those types of files signify characteristics about a given graphic, and are used for specific reasons. For example, some file types are used strictly for print purposes. Others are best used for web display. However, an analysis of graphics production and all your available options begins and ends with some basic rules of the World Wide Web and what browsers will allow.

The JPG (Joint Photographic Experts Group) is the most common file type for saving graphics on the web. Most often, a savvy designer will compose his or her creation in Adobe Photoshop in what’s called a PSD file. A PSD file is nothing more than Adobe’s native Photoshop format, which allows for higher resolution, image layering and sophisticated design element organization. Unless you’re savvy enough of a developer, you won’t even be able to display them in a browser.

(Editor’s Note: You probably could display them if you’re willing to edit the file on your server that delineates mime-types. More than likely, it suffices to say that this is something most ecommerce proprietors will never even consider.)

The same goes for TIF, EPS, BMP and PCX files. These file types are used most commonly in design work for print. You can find a definition of the most common graphic file types on these pages:

According to webopedia.com, a JPG "is a lossy compression technique for color images. Although it can reduce files sizes to about 5% of their normal size, some detail is lost in the compression.”

Simply put, JPGs can be saved at a really, really small file size. While the image – typically a graphic of photo quality – does lose something in the translation between what you create and what is displayed in a browser, it typically renders an acceptable image in the eyes of most web surfers.

On the other hand, webopedia.com called GIFs a bitmapped graphics file format used by the World Wide Web, supporting color and various resolutions. It also allows for file compression, but because the GIF is limited to 256 colors, “it is more effective for scanned images such as illustrations rather than color photos.”

The rule most designers live by is:

While that explanation includes a discussion of a PNG file, that’s an option not executed by many designers. In fact, it’s so uncommon that it doesn’t warrant discussion, much like a third-party dark horse in a presidential race. The candidate is there and might garner votes, but most pundits and even voters consider the effort a two-person affair.

As to which software to use to do design work, you have options. Besides Adobe Photoshop, you can use programs such as PaintShop Pro to create and produce Web designs. However, most folks consider the reasonable options to be limited – that’s the result of Adobe Photoshop’s dominance of the graphics production market and its saturation within the design industry. It is not an exaggeration to say that virtually every designer uses Photoshop exclusively.

On the other hand, Adobe Photoshop runs almost $700 (unless you think to buy it online, perhaps on an auction site like eBay). For the small-business owner, his or her ecommerce effort might depend on thrift. In that case, check out these Photoshop alternative discussions:

The most appealing is Adobe Photoshop Elements, a pared-down program that would allow novices to competent designers and producers to complete graphics work without providing the bells-and-whistles required for ultraserious design. It costs under $100, which isn’t half-bad when compared to $700.

However, regardless of your tools – throughout the existence of the Internet and keeping standards in mind – your choice for graphics file-type really is limited to the JPG and GIF. Always has been, and might always be. There’s nothing magical, controversial or provocative about their dominance.

The JPG compresses into really small files. The GIF does also, but can only handle a limited number of colors. In the end, your browser won’t show your graphics at any higher than 72 dpi, so you might as well shoot for the best quality you can muster at the smallest file size.

Browser technology, web standards and existing graphics products don’t really leave the site designer much choice.

Sponsored links

Buy A Sponsored Link

Add a Bookmark: Add 'Web Graphics: Why Are We So Limited?' to Del.icio.us Digg 'Web Graphics: Why Are We So Limited?' on Digg.com Submit 'Web Graphics: Why Are We So Limited?' to reddit.com Blink 'Web Graphics: Why Are We So Limited?' Add 'Web Graphics: Why Are We So Limited?' to dzone Seed 'Web Graphics: Why Are We So Limited?' on Newsvine Add 'Web Graphics: Why Are We So Limited?' to Furl Add 'Web Graphics: Why Are We So Limited?' to Spurl Add 'Web Graphics: Why Are We So Limited?' on simpy.com Add 'Web Graphics: Why Are We So Limited?' to fark.com BlogMark 'Web Graphics: Why Are We So Limited?' Add 'Web Graphics: Why Are We So Limited?' to Yahoo! myweb2 Add 'Web Graphics: Why Are We So Limited?' to wists.com Stumble It!

3 Comments

Sign-up to receive EcommerceNotes, our acclaimed email newsletter.

View A Sample | Privacy

Inside Practical eCommerce